Table
1
Classifying
Micro-Conceptual Frameworks[1]
|
Research
purpose (1) |
Research
Question (2) |
Micro-Conceptual
Framework (3) |
Research
Technique/ Method (4) |
Statistical
Techniques (5) |
|
Exploration |
Anything
Goes What,
When, Where, Why, Who, How, or any combination of the above |
Working Hypotheses |
Usually
qualitative techniques: field research, structured interviews, focus groups,
document/ archival record analysis |
Qualitative
evidence may not be statistical But
anything goes Any type of statistical analysis possible |
|
Description |
What |
Descriptive categories |
Survey and
content analysis |
Simple
descriptive statistics: Mean median, mode frequency distribution,
percentages, t-statistics |
|
Gauging |
How close
is process/policy to an ideal or standard? How can x be improved? |
Practical Ideal Type |
Case
study, survey, content analysis, document analysis, structured interviews |
Simple
descriptive statistics: Mean median, mode frequency distribution,
percentages, t-statistics |
|
Decision
making |
What is
the best decision? Which
approach? |
Models of Operations Research |
Cost
Benefit analysis, Cost Effectiveness Analysis, linear programming, decision
tree, etc. |
Quantitative
techniques of Operations Research |
|
Explanation |
Why |
Formal Hypothesis |
Usually
Quantitative, Experimental and quasi experimental design, Survey, existing
data analysis |
t-statistics,
correlation, Chi-Square, analysis of variance, simple and multiple regression |
318 Journal of Public Affairs Education
Shields, Patricia M. and Hassan
Tajali. 2006. Intermediate Theory: The Missing Link in Successful Student
Scholarship. Journal of Public Affairs
Education 12(3): 313-334. http://ecomons.txstate.edu/polsfacp/39/
http://uweb.txstate.edu/~ps07/conframe.htm
Revised 9/1/10